Using human centered design to identify opportunities for reducing inequities in perinatal care
Abstract
Background:
Extreme disparities in access, experience, and outcomes highlight the need to transform how pregnancy care is designed and delivered in the United States, especially for low-income individuals and people of color.
Methods:
We used human-centered design (HCD) to understand the challenges facing Medicaid-insured pregnant people and design interventions to address these challenges. The HCD method has three phases: Inspiration, Ideation, and Implementation. This study focused on the first and second. In the Inspiration phase we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of stakeholders who had either received or participated in the care of Medicaid-insured pregnant people within our community, with a specific emphasis on representation from marginalized communities. Using a general inductive approach to thematic analysis, we identified themes, which were then framed into design opportunities. In the Ideation phase, we conducted structured brainstorming sessions to generate potential prototypes of solutions, which were tested and iterated upon through a series of community events and engagement with a diverse community advisory group.
Results:
We engaged a total of 171 stakeholders across both phases of the HCD methodology. In the Inspiration phase, interviews with 23 community members and an eight-person focus group revealed seven insights centered around two main themes: (1) racism and discrimination create major barriers to access, experience, and the ability to deliver high-value pregnancy care; (2) pregnancy care is overmedicalized and does not treat the pregnant person as an equal and informed partner. In the Ideation phase, 162 ideas were produced and translated into eight solution prototypes. Community scoring and feedback events with 140 stakeholders led to the progressive refinement and selection of three final prototypes: (1) implementing telemedicine (video visits) within the safety-net system, (2) integrating community-based peer support workers into healthcare teams, and (3) delivering co-located pregnancy-related care and services into high-need neighborhoods as a one-stop shop.
Conclusions:
Using HCD methodology and a collaborative community-health system approach, we identified gaps, opportunities, and solutions to address perinatal care inequities within our urban community. Given the urgent need for implementable and effective solutions, the design process was particularly well-suited because it focuses on understanding and centering the needs and values of stakeholders, is multi-disciplinary through all phases, and results in prototyping and iteration of real-world solutions.
Keywords:
Human-centered design; Perinatal care.
Understanding Perspectives of African American Medicaid-Insured Women on the Process of Perinatal Care: An Opportunity for Systems Improvement. Roman LA, Raffo JE, Dertz K, Agee B, Evans D, Penninga K, Pierce T, Cunningham B, VanderMeulen P.Matern Child Health J. 2017 Dec;21(Suppl 1):81-92. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2372-2.PMID: 28965183Free PMC article.
Medicaid member perspectives on innovation in prenatal care delivery: A call to action from pregnant people using unscheduled care. Akpovi EE, Carter T, Kangovi S, Srinivas SK, Bernstein JA, Mehta PK.Healthc (Amst). 2020 Dec;8(4):100456. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100456. Epub 2020 Aug 28.PMID: 32992103
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Downe S, Finlayson K, Tunçalp Ö, Gülmezoglu AM.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.PMID: 31194903Free PMC article.
Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes. Mbuagbaw L, Medley N, Darzi AJ, Richardson M, Habiba Garga K, Ongolo-Zogo P.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 1;(12):CD010994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010994.pub2.PMID: 26621223Free PMC article.Review.
Incentives for increasing prenatal care use by women in order to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. Till SR, Everetts D, Haas DM.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 15;(12):CD009916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009916.pub2.PMID: 26671418Review.
Cited by 1article
Conversational Physical Activity Coaches for Spanish and English Speaking Women: A User Design Study. Figueroa CA, Luo TC, Jacobo A, Munoz A, Manuel M, Chan D, Canny J, Aguilera A.Front Digit Health. 2021 Oct 8;3:747153. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.747153. eCollection 2021.PMID: 34713207Free PMC article.
References
International Federation of Health Plans . International comparison of health prices report: 2017. 2017.
Howell EA, Zeitlin J. Quality of care and disparities in obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017;44:13. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2016.10.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M. Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(4):306–316. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3549(04)50052-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
McLemore MR, Altman MR, Cooper N, Williams S, Rand L, Franck L. Health care experiences of pregnant, birthing and postnatal women of color at risk for preterm birth. Soc Sci Med. 2018;201:127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.02.013. - DOI - PubMed
Scott KA, Britton L, McLemore MR. The ethics of perinatal care for black women: dismantling the structural racism in “mother blame” narratives. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2019;33(2):108–115. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000394. - DOI - PubMed